Home      Online Submission      Contact Us
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences
  • Printed Journal
  • Indexed Journal
  • Refereed Journal
  • Peer Reviewed Journal
ISSN Print: 2394-7489, ISSN Online: 2394-7497
ICV 2018: 74.52

International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences

2017, Vol. 3 Issue 4, Part C

Comparative evaluation between physics forceps and conventional extraction forceps in extraction of maxillary molars

AUTHOR(S): Dr. Sulphi Abdul Basheer
ABSTRACT:Atraumatic dental extraction preserves bone, gingival architecture, and allows for the option of future or immediate dental implant placement. A number of tools and techniques have been proposed for minimally invasive tooth removal such as physics forceps.
Methodology: Subjects were divided into two groups including Conventional & Physical forceps for extracting of maxilliary molars. Parameters like fracture of the bone, Cortical plate, gingival laceration, healing, bleeding & Pain were assessed.
Results: All the parameters showed difference between physical group than conventional forceps.
Conclusion: The biomechanical design of physics forceps decreases the incidence of root fracture, and maintains the buccal bone plate, which is essential for the proper healing of an immediately placed dental implant.
Pages: 152-154  |  666 Views  11 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Dr. Sulphi Abdul Basheer. Comparative evaluation between physics forceps and conventional extraction forceps in extraction of maxillary molars. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2017; 3(4): 152-154.
Call for book chapter
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences